linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 71/85] btrfs: abort transaction if we fail to update the delayed inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210704230420.1488358-71-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun,  4 Jul 2021 19:04:06 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 71/85] btrfs: abort transaction if we fail to update the delayed inode

From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>

[ Upstream commit 04587ad9bef6ce9d510325b4ba9852b6129eebdb ]

If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the transaction,
because we could leave an inode with the improper counts or some other
such corruption behind.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index 3091540fc22a..3bb8b919d2c1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -1050,6 +1050,14 @@ static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(fs_info, node, (ret < 0));
 	btrfs_release_delayed_inode(node);
 
+	/*
+	 * If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the
+	 * transaction, because we could leave the inode with the improper
+	 * counts behind.
+	 */
+	if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)
+		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+
 	return ret;
 
 search:
-- 
2.30.2