[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOK9Gbcd63QkU5LB@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:04:41 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
ast@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, kernel-team@...com,
yhs@...com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v8 08/13] arm: kprobes: Make a space for
regs->ARM_pc at kretprobe_trampoline
* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> Change kretprobe_trampoline to make a space for regs->ARM_pc so that
> kretprobe_trampoline_handler can call instruction_pointer_set()
> safely.
The idiom is "make space", but in any case, what does this mean?
Was the stack frame set up in kretprobe_trampoline() and calling
trampoline_handler() buggy?
If yes, then explain the bad effects of the bug, and make all of this clear
in the title & changelog.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists