[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54648043-4944-08f9-8ce8-8413d8037450@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:13:59 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 62/80] sched/fair: Take thermal pressure into
account while estimating energy
Hi Sasha,
+CC Greg
On 7/5/21 12:05 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 489f16459e0008c7a5c4c5af34bd80898aa82c2d ]
>
> Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) needs to be able to predict the frequency
> requests made by the SchedUtil governor to properly estimate energy used
> in the future. It has to take into account CPUs utilization and forecast
> Performance Domain (PD) frequency. There is a corner case when the max
> allowed frequency might be reduced due to thermal. SchedUtil is aware of
> that reduced frequency, so it should be taken into account also in EAS
> estimations.
>
> SchedUtil, as a CPUFreq governor, knows the maximum allowed frequency of
> a CPU, thanks to cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() and internal clamping
> to 'policy::max'. SchedUtil is responsible to respect that upper limit
> while setting the frequency through CPUFreq drivers. This effective
> frequency is stored internally in 'sugov_policy::next_freq' and EAS has
> to predict that value.
>
> In the existing code the raw value of arch_scale_cpu_capacity() is used
> for clamping the returned CPU utilization from effective_cpu_util().
> This patch fixes issue with too big single CPU utilization, by introducing
> clamping to the allowed CPU capacity. The allowed CPU capacity is a CPU
> capacity reduced by thermal pressure raw value.
>
> Thanks to knowledge about allowed CPU capacity, we don't get too big value
> for a single CPU utilization, which is then added to the util sum. The
> util sum is used as a source of information for estimating whole PD energy.
> To avoid wrong energy estimation in EAS (due to capped frequency), make
> sure that the calculation of util sum is aware of allowed CPU capacity.
>
> This thermal pressure might be visible in scenarios where the CPUs are not
> heavily loaded, but some other component (like GPU) drastically reduced
> available power budget and increased the SoC temperature. Thus, we still
> use EAS for task placement and CPUs are not over-utilized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210614191128.22735-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
It has been picked up automatically right?
To make it fully working you need also this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20210614191030.22241-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/
It makes sure that the thermal pressure signal gets proper
information also for CPUs which were offline and then wake-up.
It has a proper fix tagging with commit hash id.
That patch can be ported to stable: v5.6+
I can send it to stable list. Please let me know if you need
any help.
The same applies to patch which I found for v5.13-stable:
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 65/85] sched/fair: Take thermal pressure into
account while estimating energy
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20210704230420.1488358-65-sashal@kernel.org/T/#u
Regards,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists