[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOLXTB6VxtLBmsuC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 12:56:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, nickhu@...estech.com, green.hu@...il.com,
deanbo422@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
yury.norov@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...ogle.com,
joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] refactor the ringtest testing for ptr_ring
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 11:57:33AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> tools/include/* have a lot of abstract layer for building
> kernel code from userspace, so reuse or add the abstract
> layer in tools/include/ to build the ptr_ring for ringtest
> testing.
...
> create mode 100644 tools/include/asm/cache.h
> create mode 100644 tools/include/asm/processor.h
> create mode 100644 tools/include/generated/autoconf.h
> create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/align.h
> create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/cache.h
> create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/slab.h
Maybe somebody can change this to be able to include in-tree headers directly?
Besides above, had you tested this with `make O=...`?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists