[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210705111453.164230-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 19:14:51 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next 1/3] vmalloc: Choose a better start address in vm_area_register_early()
There are some fixed locations in the vmalloc area be reserved
in ARM(see iotable_init()) and ARM64(see map_kernel()), but for
pcpu_page_first_chunk(), it calls vm_area_register_early() and
choose VMALLOC_START as the start address of vmap area which
could be conflicted with above address, then could trigger a
BUG_ON in vm_area_add_early().
Let's choose the end of existing address range in vmlist as the
start address instead of VMALLOC_START to avoid the BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index d5cd52805149..a98cf97f032f 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2238,12 +2238,14 @@ void __init vm_area_add_early(struct vm_struct *vm)
*/
void __init vm_area_register_early(struct vm_struct *vm, size_t align)
{
- static size_t vm_init_off __initdata;
+ unsigned long vm_start = VMALLOC_START;
+ struct vm_struct *tmp;
unsigned long addr;
- addr = ALIGN(VMALLOC_START + vm_init_off, align);
- vm_init_off = PFN_ALIGN(addr + vm->size) - VMALLOC_START;
+ for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next)
+ vm_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr + tmp->size;
+ addr = ALIGN(vm_start, align);
vm->addr = (void *)addr;
vm_area_add_early(vm);
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists