[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210705144914.35094-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 15:49:00 +0100
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
etienne.carriere@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
souvik.chakravarty@....com, cristian.marussi@....com,
igor.skalkin@...nsynergy.com, peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com,
alex.bennee@...aro.org, jean-philippe@...aro.org,
mikhail.golubev@...nsynergy.com, anton.yakovlev@...nsynergy.com,
Vasyl.Vavrychuk@...nsynergy.com,
Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/15] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid padding in sensor message structure
Structure scmi_resp_sensor_reading_complete is meant to represent an SCMI
asynchronous reading complete message: representing the readings field with
a 64bit type forces padding and breaks reads in scmi_sensor_reading_get.
Split it in two adjacent 32bit readings_low/high subfields to avoid padding
or the need to make it packed.
Fixes: e2083d3673916 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.0 sensors timestamped reads")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
index 2c88aa221559..308471586381 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
@@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ struct scmi_msg_sensor_reading_get {
struct scmi_resp_sensor_reading_complete {
__le32 id;
- __le64 readings;
+ __le32 readings_low;
+ __le32 readings_high;
};
struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp {
@@ -717,7 +718,8 @@ static int scmi_sensor_reading_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
resp = t->rx.buf;
if (le32_to_cpu(resp->id) == sensor_id)
- *value = get_unaligned_le64(&resp->readings);
+ *value =
+ get_unaligned_le64(&resp->readings_low);
else
ret = -EPROTO;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists