lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:19:12 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@...il.com>
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND] dmaengine: Loongson1: Add Loongson1 dmaengine
 driver

On 04-07-21, 22:45, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
> Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> 于2021年6月7日周一 下午7:07写道:
> >
> > On 21-05-21, 07:02, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > +config LOONGSON1_DMA
> > > +     tristate "Loongson1 DMA support"
> > > +     depends on MACH_LOONGSON32
> >
> > Why does it have to do that? The dma driver is generic..
> 
> This driver is only available for LOONGSON32 CPUs.

the underlaying firmware would ensure this driver is probed if you have
such a device, so why have this restriction?

> > > +static struct platform_driver ls1x_dma_driver = {
> > > +     .probe  = ls1x_dma_probe,
> > > +     .remove = ls1x_dma_remove,
> > > +     .driver = {
> > > +             .name   = "ls1x-dma",
> > > +     },
> >
> > No device tree?
> 
> Because the LOONGSON32 platform doesn't support DT yet.

Okay so how is the platform device created?

-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ