[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOKBOFpNH0+3GN6e@matsya>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:19:12 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@...il.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND] dmaengine: Loongson1: Add Loongson1 dmaengine
driver
On 04-07-21, 22:45, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
> Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> 于2021年6月7日周一 下午7:07写道:
> >
> > On 21-05-21, 07:02, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > +config LOONGSON1_DMA
> > > + tristate "Loongson1 DMA support"
> > > + depends on MACH_LOONGSON32
> >
> > Why does it have to do that? The dma driver is generic..
>
> This driver is only available for LOONGSON32 CPUs.
the underlaying firmware would ensure this driver is probed if you have
such a device, so why have this restriction?
> > > +static struct platform_driver ls1x_dma_driver = {
> > > + .probe = ls1x_dma_probe,
> > > + .remove = ls1x_dma_remove,
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = "ls1x-dma",
> > > + },
> >
> > No device tree?
>
> Because the LOONGSON32 platform doesn't support DT yet.
Okay so how is the platform device created?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists