[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d883403c-abe5-8f98-11eb-a70606040e0a@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 22:31:12 +0530
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>
CC: <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: tegra: Use 'seq_puts' instead of 'seq_printf'
Reviewed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
On 5/4/2021 10:47 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> As spotted by checkpatch, use 'seq_puts' instead of 'seq_printf' when
> possible.
> It is slightly more efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> index 006bf0346dec..fe8e21ce3e3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> @@ -2550,7 +2550,7 @@ static void *tegra_pcie_ports_seq_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos)
> if (list_empty(&pcie->ports))
> return NULL;
>
> - seq_printf(s, "Index Status\n");
> + seq_puts(s, "Index Status\n");
>
> return seq_list_start(&pcie->ports, *pos);
> }
> @@ -2587,16 +2587,16 @@ static int tegra_pcie_ports_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> seq_printf(s, "%2u ", port->index);
>
> if (up)
> - seq_printf(s, "up");
> + seq_puts(s, "up");
>
> if (active) {
> if (up)
> - seq_printf(s, ", ");
> + seq_puts(s, ", ");
>
> - seq_printf(s, "active");
> + seq_puts(s, "active");
> }
>
> - seq_printf(s, "\n");
> + seq_puts(s, "\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists