lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d634baf-8abe-480d-61ed-ade1945324ee@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Jul 2021 10:12:55 -0400
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     ak@...ux.intel.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix IIO cleanup mapping procedure
 for SNR/ICX



On 7/6/2021 5:07 AM, alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Cleanup mapping procedure for IIO PMU is needed to free memory which was
> allocated for topology data and for attributes in IIO mapping
> attribute_group.
> Current implementation of this procedure for Snowridge and Icelake Server
> platforms doesn't free allocated memory that can be a reason for memory
> leak issue.
> Fix the issue with IIO cleanup mapping procedure for these platforms
> to release allocated memory.
> 
> Fixes: 10337e95e04c ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Enable I/O stacks to IIO PMON mapping on ICX")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com>

The patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>


With this fix, there will be several similar codes repeat, e.g., 
XXX_iio_set_mapping() and XXX_iio_cleanup_mapping(), for SKX, ICX, and 
SNR for now.
I guess there will be more for the future platforms. Have you considered 
to add a macro or something to reduce the code repetition?

Thanks,
Kan

> ---
>   arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index bb6eb1e5569c..54cdbb96e628 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -3836,26 +3836,32 @@ pmu_iio_set_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type, struct attribute_group *ag)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -static int skx_iio_set_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
> -{
> -	return pmu_iio_set_mapping(type, &skx_iio_mapping_group);
> -}
> -
> -static void skx_iio_cleanup_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
> +static void
> +pmu_iio_cleanup_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type, struct attribute_group *ag)
>   {
> -	struct attribute **attr = skx_iio_mapping_group.attrs;
> +	struct attribute **attr = ag->attrs;
>   
>   	if (!attr)
>   		return;
>   
>   	for (; *attr; attr++)
>   		kfree((*attr)->name);
> -	kfree(attr_to_ext_attr(*skx_iio_mapping_group.attrs));
> -	kfree(skx_iio_mapping_group.attrs);
> -	skx_iio_mapping_group.attrs = NULL;
> +	kfree(attr_to_ext_attr(*ag->attrs));
> +	kfree(ag->attrs);
> +	ag->attrs = NULL;
>   	kfree(type->topology);
>   }
>   
> +static int skx_iio_set_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
> +{
> +	return pmu_iio_set_mapping(type, &skx_iio_mapping_group);
> +}
> +
> +static void skx_iio_cleanup_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
> +{
> +	pmu_iio_cleanup_mapping(type, &skx_iio_mapping_group);
> +}
> +
>   static struct intel_uncore_type skx_uncore_iio = {
>   	.name			= "iio",
>   	.num_counters		= 4,
> @@ -4499,6 +4505,11 @@ static int snr_iio_set_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
>   	return pmu_iio_set_mapping(type, &snr_iio_mapping_group);
>   }
>   
> +static void snr_iio_cleanup_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
> +{
> +	pmu_iio_cleanup_mapping(type, &snr_iio_mapping_group);
> +}
> +
>   static struct intel_uncore_type snr_uncore_iio = {
>   	.name			= "iio",
>   	.num_counters		= 4,
> @@ -4515,7 +4526,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type snr_uncore_iio = {
>   	.attr_update		= snr_iio_attr_update,
>   	.get_topology		= snr_iio_get_topology,
>   	.set_mapping		= snr_iio_set_mapping,
> -	.cleanup_mapping	= skx_iio_cleanup_mapping,
> +	.cleanup_mapping	= snr_iio_cleanup_mapping,
>   };
>   
>   static struct intel_uncore_type snr_uncore_irp = {
> @@ -5090,6 +5101,11 @@ static int icx_iio_set_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
>   	return pmu_iio_set_mapping(type, &icx_iio_mapping_group);
>   }
>   
> +static void icx_iio_cleanup_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
> +{
> +	pmu_iio_cleanup_mapping(type, &icx_iio_mapping_group);
> +}
> +
>   static struct intel_uncore_type icx_uncore_iio = {
>   	.name			= "iio",
>   	.num_counters		= 4,
> @@ -5107,7 +5123,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type icx_uncore_iio = {
>   	.attr_update		= icx_iio_attr_update,
>   	.get_topology		= icx_iio_get_topology,
>   	.set_mapping		= icx_iio_set_mapping,
> -	.cleanup_mapping	= skx_iio_cleanup_mapping,
> +	.cleanup_mapping	= icx_iio_cleanup_mapping,
>   };
>   
>   static struct intel_uncore_type icx_uncore_irp = {
> 
> base-commit: 3dbdb38e286903ec220aaf1fb29a8d94297da246
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ