[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210706140513.GA26498@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 16:05:13 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@....com, paulus@...ba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
bskeggs@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@...el.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@...gle.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
jgross@...e.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, xypron.glpk@....de,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for
swiotlb data bouncing
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> FWIW I was pondering the question of whether to do something along those
> lines or just scrap the default assignment entirely, so since I hadn't got
> round to saying that I've gone ahead and hacked up the alternative
> (similarly untested) for comparison :)
>
> TBH I'm still not sure which one I prefer...
Claire did implement something like your suggestion originally, but
I don't really like it as it doesn't scale for adding multiple global
pools, e.g. for the 64-bit addressable one for the various encrypted
secure guest schemes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists