[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOR5Ia4XnZhiDNQX@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:39:13 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/sgx: Add sgx_nr_all_pages to the debugfs
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 07:56:40AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/5/21 7:36 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Create /sys/kernel/debug/x86/sgx_nr_all_pages, which reports total
> > number of EPC pages available in the system.
> Could we flesh this out a bit, please?
>
> What's the value here when userspace could just re-enumerate the EPC
> size from CPUID?
>
> I'd really appreciate if we could draw parallels between these additions
> to the "SGX VM" and their analogs in the "core VM". In this case, I
> think the closest analog is probably "MemTotal" in /proc/meminfo.
>
> Second, how is this going to be used?
>
> Third, is this going to be the ABI forever?
debugfs is never a stable abi. If it is being used as such, then the
kernel code is wrong. This better just be debugging stuff only.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists