[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210706160543.3qfekhzalwsrtahv@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 18:05:43 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/cio: Make struct css_driver::remove return
void
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 05:58:25PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06 2021, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > The driver core ignores the return value of css_remove()
> > (because there is only little it can do when a device disappears) and
> > there are no pci_epf_drivers with a remove callback.
>
> s/pci_epf/css/
Argh, too much copy&paste. I make this:
The driver core ignores the return value of css_remove()
(because there is only little it can do when a device
disappears) and all callbacks return 0 anyhow.
to make this actually correct.
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists