[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1c026c6-22c7-8979-4941-de9cfab3863a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:14:16 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
grant.likely@....com, paulus@...ba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
bskeggs@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@...el.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@...gle.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
jgross@...e.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, xypron.glpk@....de,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for
swiotlb data bouncing
Hi Will and Robin,
On 7/6/2021 10:06 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 04:39:11PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2021-07-06 15:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>> FWIW I was pondering the question of whether to do something along those
>>>> lines or just scrap the default assignment entirely, so since I hadn't got
>>>> round to saying that I've gone ahead and hacked up the alternative
>>>> (similarly untested) for comparison :)
>>>>
>>>> TBH I'm still not sure which one I prefer...
>>>
>>> Claire did implement something like your suggestion originally, but
>>> I don't really like it as it doesn't scale for adding multiple global
>>> pools, e.g. for the 64-bit addressable one for the various encrypted
>>> secure guest schemes.
>>
>> Ah yes, that had slipped my mind, and it's a fair point indeed. Since we're
>> not concerned with a minimal fix for backports anyway I'm more than happy to
>> focus on Will's approach. Another thing is that that looks to take us a
>> quiet step closer to the possibility of dynamically resizing a SWIOTLB pool,
>> which is something that some of the hypervisor protection schemes looking to
>> build on top of this series may want to explore at some point.
>
> Ok, I'll split that nasty diff I posted up into a reviewable series and we
> can take it from there.
For what it's worth, I attempted to boot Will's diff on top of Konrad's
devel/for-linus-5.14 and it did not work; in fact, I got no output on my
monitor period, even with earlyprintk=, and I do not think this machine
has a serial console.
Robin's fix does work, it survived ten reboots with no issues getting to
X and I do not see the KASAN and slub debug messages anymore but I
understand that this is not the preferred solution it seems (although
Konrad did want to know if it works).
I am happy to test any further patches or follow ups as needed, just
keep me on CC.
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists