[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210706203419.GA213769@rocinante>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 22:34:19 +0200
From: Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan2@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/40] PCI: keystone: Cleanup MSI/legacy interrupt
configuration and handling
Hi Kishon,
[...]
> > Would it be possible to resurrect this? Do you need any help?
>
> A lot of patches in this series should already be merged (after
> splitting into smaller ones)
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=71185
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20190321095927.7058-1-kishon@ti.com/
Ah! Nice!
[...]
> Are there any other clean-ups you are looking into?
Bjorn was looking recently at struct keystone_pcie and suggested that
perhaps things such as for example the legacy_host_irqs member could be
refactored - in this particular case it seems to only store a single
item in the array, etc.
And this series of patches I found is refactoring a lot of the elements
of the driver and thus the struct keystone_pcie too in due process.
I suppose, it would be just better to wait for you to complete all the
work you have planned? What do you think?
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists