[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:33:29 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, mpe@...erman.id.au,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
ito-yuichi@...itsu.com, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, wens@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] arm64: Add framework to turn an IPI as NMI
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 16:13, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-05 10:34, Sumit Garg wrote:
>
> > Do you have any further feedback on this patch-set?
>
> None at the moment. We have tons of issues to solve with the arm64
> interrupt entry code vs instrumentation at the moment, so it is
> pretty much at the bottom of the priority list for now.
>
I hope you were able to resolve most of the issues. Is it an
appropriate time to have a relook at this pseudo NMI feature?
-Sumit
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists