[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:20:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
ast@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, kernel-team@...com, yhs@...com,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
wuqiang.matt@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v8 11/13] x86/unwind: Recover kretprobe trampoline
entry
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 07:15:10PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> I actually don't want to keep this feature because no one use it.
> (only systemtap needs it?)
Yeah, you mentioned systemtap, but since that's out-of-tree I don't
care. Their problem.
> Anyway, if we keep the idea-level compatibility (not code level),
> what we need is 'void *data' in the struct kretprobe_instance.
> User who needs it can allocate their own instance data for their
> kretprobes when initialising it and sets in their entry handler.
>
> Then we can have a simple kretprobe_instance.
When would you do the alloc? When installing the retprobe, but that
might be inside the allocator, which means you can't call the allocator
etc.. :-)
If we look at struct ftrace_ret_stack, it has a few fixed function
fields. The calltime one is all that is needed for the kretprobe
example code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists