[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 13:28:11 +0200
From: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/cio: Make struct css_driver::remove return
void
Thank you. I will use the modified description. This will be picked up
by Vasily/Heiko to the s390-tree.
Also Acked-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>
One question, is this patchset supposed to have 4 patches ? Are we
missing one ?
On 7/6/21 6:05 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Argh, too much copy&paste. I make this:
>
> The driver core ignores the return value of css_remove()
> (because there is only little it can do when a device
> disappears) and all callbacks return 0 anyhow.
>
> to make this actually correct.
>
>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck<cohuck@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists