[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:34:31 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/cio: Make struct css_driver::remove return
void
Hello Vineeth,
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Vineeth Vijayan wrote:
> Thank you. I will use the modified description. This will be picked up by
> Vasily/Heiko to the s390-tree.
>
> Also Acked-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> One question, is this patchset supposed to have 4 patches ? Are we missing
> one ?
Yes, the fourth patch[1] has the following shortstat:
80 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 219 deletions(-)
and the affected files are distributed over the whole source tree.
Given that this fourth patch is the actual motivation for the first
three, and I'd like to get this in during the next merge window, I would
prefer if these patches were taken together. (Well unless the first
three make it into 5.14-rc1 of course.)
Best regards
Uwe
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210706154803.1631813-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists