lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 07 Jul 2021 10:53:49 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog9@...lescrag.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add check for common mailing list helper
 checks

On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 12:31 -0700, John 'Warthog9' Hawley wrote:
> On 7/3/21 11:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 15:37 -0700, John 'Warthog9' Hawley (VMware)
> > wrote:
> > > From: John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog9@...lescrag.net>
> > > 
> > > Mailing lists in an attempt to try and avoid sending certain
> > > administrative e-mails to the list, will check the first few lines
> > > (usually ~10) looking for keywords.  If those key words are found it
> > > shunts the e-mail to the list admin contact instead of potentially
> > > passing it through to the list.
> > 
> > Perhaps the below is a bit better, but I believe a few of the tests
> > are going to be tripped a bit too often.
> > 
> > Especially "cancel", "config" and maybe "subscribe" too.
> > 
> > For instance:
> > 
> > $ git log --grep='\bcancel\b' -P -i --pretty=oneline -10000 | wc -l
> > 1693
> > 
> > $ git log --grep='^config\b' -P -i --pretty=oneline -10000 | wc -l
> > 890
> > 
> > $ git log --grep='\bsubscribe\b' -P -i --pretty=oneline -10000 | wc -l
> > 123
> 
> A part of getting this into checkpatch.pl is getting some better
> feedback mechanisms for why patches may not be passing through the list
> correctly with regexes that have been in place for at least 14 years.
> These, aren't tripped over often,

3000+ commits with regex matches seem rather a lot to me.

> but have run into a instance at least
> recently that triggered me trying to get at least some self check, and
> notification, pieces in place.

No worries, but perhaps the message might be reworded to
say something about possible mailing list moderation rather
than imply rejection.

> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> > @@ -865,6 +865,37 @@ our $allowed_asm_includes = qr{(?x:
> >  )};
> >  # memory.h: ARM has a custom one
> > 
> > +our $mailing_list_phrases = qr{(?xi:
> > +	\bcancel\b |

Mere use of the word "cancel" in the commit description seems undesirable to me.

> > +# check if words in the commit message may trip up common mailing list helpers
> > +# to redirect email to the admin contact
> > +		if ($in_commit_log && $commit_log_lines < 10 &&
> > +		    $line =~ /($mailing_list_phrases)/) {
> > +			WARN("MAILING_LIST_HELPER",
> > +			     "Line matches common mailing list helpers and may not be delivered correctly - consider rewording '$1'\n" . $herecurr);

Maybe FILTERS for phrases and helpers

Maybe something like:

"Use of '$1' in this patch's commit description might cause mailing list moderation or rejection\n"


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ