lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:20:07 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] selftests/sgx: Trigger the reclaimer and #PF handler

On 7/7/21 1:50 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> There is consistent known behaviour how reclaimer and also the page fault
> are exercised for each test. I think that is what matters most right now
> that the basic behaviour of both the page reclaimer and page fault handler
> gets exercised.

There's also a lot of value to ensuring that tests can run _quickly_.
If you have a test that fails one out of a million executions, it's a
lot easier find and debug if it takes 1 ms versus 10 seconds.

In other words, I think I'd prefer if we run two enclaves in each
execution of the selftest.  One can be as small as possible.  The other
can be the reclaim-triggering one.

That's good both for test coverage, and it makes it a *bit* more
straightforward to hack out the reclaim test if you need things to run
faster.

The pkeys selftest isn't a bad example here either.  It has a couple of
different "malloc()" options: THP, hugetlbfs, small-page mmap(), and a
bunch of tests it runs on each type.  As we add more SGX tests, we might
end up with "do reclaim" just being an option we pass.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ