[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:43:32 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: atmel: ATMEL drivers depend on HAS_DMA
On 7/7/21 12:42 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 07/07/2021 16:40:34+0000, Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com wrote:
>> On 29.06.2021 00:11, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On a config (such as arch/sh/) which does not set HAS_DMA when MMU
>>> is not set, several ATMEL ASoC drivers select symbols that cause
>>> kconfig warnings. There is one "depends on HAS_DMA" here but several
>>> more are needed to prevent kconfig warnings since 'select' does not
>>> recognize any dependencies.
>>>
>>> Fix the following kconfig warnings:
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC
>>> Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>> Selected by [m]:
>>> - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m]
>>> - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m]
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC
>>> Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>> Selected by [m]:
>>> - SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9G20_WM8731 [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && SND_SOC_I2C_AND_SPI [=m]
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC
>>> Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>> Selected by [m]:
>>> - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m]
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA
>>> Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>> Selected by [m]:
>>> - SND_ATMEL_SOC_WM8904 [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && I2C [=m]
>>> - SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9X5_WM8731 [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && SND_SOC_I2C_AND_SPI [=m]
>>
>> Hi Randy,
>>
>> Sorry about my delayed response. I think it would be better to just
>> remove HAS_DMA from SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC, since it seems to compile fine
>> without it. This should fix all the problems...
>>
>
> I bet this is correct since m32r is gone.
Yes, that builds for me with no problems.
I'll submit that patch soon.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists