[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:32:17 -0600
From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Morris James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
scott.branden@...adcom.com, Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>, Gary Lin <glin@...e.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 05/12] integrity: Introduce mok keyring
> On Jul 7, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 12:31:23PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 7:45 PM Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Introduce a new keyring called mok. This keyring will be used during
>>> boot. Afterwards it will be destroyed.
>>
>> Already discussed elsewhere, but yeah, when using TLA's, unless they
>> are universally understood (like "CPU" or "TLB" or whatever), please
>> spell them out somewhere for people who don't have the background.
>>
>> I saw that you said elsewhere that MOK is "Machine Owner Key", but
>> please let's just have that in the sources and commit messages at
>> least for the original new code cases.
>>
>> Maybe it becomes obvious over time as there is more history to the
>> code, but when you literally introduce a new concept, please spell it
>> out.
>>
>> Linus
>>
> I'd suggest for the short summary:
>
> "integrity: Introduce a Linux keyring for the Machine Owner Key (MOK)"
>
> Given that "keyring" is such a saturated and ambiguous word, and this not a
> subsystem patch for keyring itself, it should be explicit what is meant by
> a keyring.
If we can go in this direction, I will update the heading as Jarkko has
suggested in a follow on series. I will also include a better summary in
this patch, along with a MOK explanation at the beginning. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists