[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YObfhBXAu6g5S3ws@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:20:36 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@...eaurora.org>,
Chris Lew <clew@...eaurora.org>,
Mathieu <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/4] Signaling api support in glink/rpmsg clients
On Wed, 07 Jul 2021, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 06 Jul 10:27 CDT 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Sept 2020 at 17:25, Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@...eaurora.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Change from version 6
> > > In last series(v6) i had put wrong version(v5) for cover note.
> > > Which led to confusion for patch set series.
> > >
> > > In this series i have updated the label for cover letter(v7).
> > > There is no change in patches. Only cover note label is updated.
> > >
> > > Change from version 5
> > > [V6,4/4] rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
> > > Updated for sparse warning. Replaced POLLPRI => EPOLLPRI to fix
> > > warning.
> > >
> > > Change from version 4
> > > I am taking over these patches from aneela@...eaurora.org
> > > Fixed all the trivial review comments.
> > >
> > > Signal conversion to and from native signal as done in patch V4,2/4
> > > is intentional.
> > >
> > > Arun Kumar Neelakantam (3):
> > > rpmsg: glink: Add support to handle signals command
> > > rpmsg: char: Add TIOCMGET/TIOCMSET ioctl support
> > > rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
> > >
> > > Deepak Kumar Singh (1):
> > > rpmsg: core: Add signal API support
> > >
> > > drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 125
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 40 ++++++++++++
> > > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h | 5 ++
> > > include/linux/rpmsg.h | 27 ++++++++
> > > 5 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Any idea why this died at v7?
> >
>
> I had some concerns about the actual users of this and wanted the API to
> be more generic. Deepak brought this up again recently and I think we
> have a common understanding of how v8 should look like.
Okay, great.
Deepak, would you be kind enough to Cc me on the next submission please?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists