linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs for 5.14-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210708225221.30f1100b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:52:21 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List 
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs for 5.14-rc1

Hi Jan,

On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:52:17 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Whether that particular series causing the conflict will be merged by Linus
> in this merge window is uncertain - Linus didn't like how filemap_fault()
> unconditionally acquired the lock. I've created an optimization patch to avoid
> that but review is pending... At this point I'm leaning towards the variant
> that series won't go in during the merge window. In that case I'll
> probably rebase on top of rc1 and force-push everything.

No worries, thanks for the reply.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped