linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs for 5.14-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Jul 2021 17:10:18 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List 
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs for 5.14-rc1

Hi Stephen,

On 07/08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:58:50 -0700 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Could you please consider this pull request?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > The following changes since commit bd3c9cdb21a2674dd0db70199df884828e37abd4:
> > 
> >   Merge tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux (2021-05-14 10:52:47 -0700)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git tags/f2fs-for-5.14-rc1
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to 28607bf3aa6f9762b32dc7f1ed0488823c0651b8:
> > 
> >   f2fs: drop dirty node pages when cp is in error status (2021-07-06 22:05:06 -0700)
> 
> Its worth mentioning the semantic conflict against the ext3 tree (which
> hasn't been merged by Linus yet, but presumably will be).
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210623104922.30a5a3fa@canb.auug.org.au/

I think this looks good to me. Thank you~

> 
> The ext3 commit has been rebased and is now
> 
>   1474c39351f0 ("f2fs: Convert to using invalidate_lock")
> 
> but I am still applying the mentioned merge resolution patch.
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell