[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49aa4ddb-ca58-e0df-0675-daa72866d3db@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 15:14:24 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xen/blkfront: don't trust the backend response
data blindly
On 08.07.21 15:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 08.07.2021 14:43, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Today blkfront will trust the backend to send only sane response data.
>> In order to avoid privilege escalations or crashes in case of malicious
>> backends verify the data to be within expected limits. Especially make
>> sure that the response always references an outstanding request.
>>
>> Introduce a new state of the ring BLKIF_STATE_ERROR which will be
>> switched to in case an inconsistency is being detected. Recovering from
>> this state is possible only via removing and adding the virtual device
>> again (e.g. via a suspend/resume cycle).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> albeit ...
>
>> @@ -1602,7 +1628,8 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> case BLKIF_OP_DISCARD:
>> if (unlikely(bret.status == BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP)) {
>> struct request_queue *rq = info->rq;
>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
>> +
>> + pr_warn_ratelimited("blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
>> info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret.operation));
>> blkif_req(req)->error = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
>> info->feature_discard = 0;
>> @@ -1614,13 +1641,13 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> case BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE:
>> case BLKIF_OP_WRITE_BARRIER:
>> if (unlikely(bret.status == BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP)) {
>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
>> + pr_warn_ratelimited("blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
>> info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret.operation));
>> blkif_req(req)->error = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
>> }
>> if (unlikely(bret.status == BLKIF_RSP_ERROR &&
>> rinfo->shadow[id].req.u.rw.nr_segments == 0)) {
>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: empty %s op failed\n",
>> + pr_warn_ratelimited("blkfront: %s: empty %s op failed\n",
>> info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret.operation));
>> blkif_req(req)->error = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
>> }
>> @@ -1635,8 +1662,8 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> case BLKIF_OP_READ:
>> case BLKIF_OP_WRITE:
>> if (unlikely(bret.status != BLKIF_RSP_OKAY))
>> - dev_dbg(&info->xbdev->dev, "Bad return from blkdev data "
>> - "request: %x\n", bret.status);
>> + dev_dbg_ratelimited(&info->xbdev->dev,
>> + "Bad return from blkdev data request: %x\n", bret.status);
>>
>> break;
>> default:
>
> ... all of these look kind of unrelated to the topic of the patch,
> and the conversion also isn't mentioned as on-purpose in the
> description.
Hmm, yes, I'll add a sentence to the commit message.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3092 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists