[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0402MB27601F676286D00AE50B144988199@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 03:01:15 +0000
From: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>
CC: "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] clk: not calculate new rate for protected clks
> Subject: [PATCH] clk: not calculate new rate for protected clks
Gentle ping...
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> If the protect_count of the parent clk is not 0, we not calculate new rates for
> parent. Otherwise, the common clk framework may configure other child clks
> that is under using.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index
> 65508eb89ec9..8ac121838e13 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static struct clk_core *clk_calc_new_rates(struct
> clk_core *core,
> }
>
> if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) && parent &&
> - best_parent_rate != parent->rate)
> + best_parent_rate != parent->rate &&
> +!clk_core_rate_is_protected(parent))
> top = clk_calc_new_rates(parent, best_parent_rate);
>
> out:
> --
> 2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists