linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/PCI: Handle PIRQ routing tables with no router device given

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <60E726E2.2050104@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 08 Jul 2021 19:25:06 +0300
From:   Nikolai Zhubr <zhubr.2@...il.com>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
CC:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/PCI: Handle PIRQ routing tables with no router
 device given

Hello Maciej,

06.07.2021 14:30, Maciej W. Rozycki:
> Changes from v1:
>
> - preinitialise `dev' in `pirq_find_router' for `for_each_pci_dev',
>
> - avoid calling `pirq_try_router' with null `dev'.
> ---
>   arch/x86/pci/irq.c |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> linux-x86-pirq-router-nodev.diff

Success!
Here is new log:

https://pastebin.com/QXaUsCV4

and --

# 8259A.pl
irq 0: 00, edge
irq 1: 00, edge
irq 2: 00, edge
irq 3: 00, edge
irq 4: 00, edge
irq 5: 00, edge
irq 6: 00, edge
irq 7: 00, edge
irq 8: 02, edge
irq 9: 02, level
irq 10: 02, edge
irq 11: 02, edge
irq 12: 02, edge
irq 13: 02, edge
irq 14: 02, edge
irq 15: 02, edge

Some notes:
- please ignore the backtrace from 8139too, it is expected and will be 
worked on later;
- the message line " -> edge" looks somewhat strange, my guess is it 
might be a small unintentional leftover of some bigger and more detailed 
message/debugging, anyway, I'd humbly suppose "Triggering mode adjusted" 
would look better.

Thank you!


Regards,
Nikolai


> Index: linux-macro-ide-tty/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-macro-ide-tty.orig/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> +++ linux-macro-ide-tty/arch/x86/pci/irq.c
> @@ -908,10 +908,32 @@ static struct pci_dev *pirq_router_dev;
>    *	chipset" ?
>    */
>
> +static bool __init pirq_try_router(struct irq_router *r,
> +				   struct irq_routing_table *rt,
> +				   struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct irq_router_handler *h;
> +
> +	DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Trying IRQ router for [%04x:%04x]\n",
> +	    dev->vendor, dev->device);
> +
> +	for (h = pirq_routers; h->vendor; h++) {
> +		/* First look for a router match */
> +		if (rt->rtr_vendor == h->vendor&&
> +		    h->probe(r, dev, rt->rtr_device))
> +			return true;
> +		/* Fall back to a device match */
> +		if (dev->vendor == h->vendor&&
> +		    h->probe(r, dev, dev->device))
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>   static void __init pirq_find_router(struct irq_router *r)
>   {
>   	struct irq_routing_table *rt = pirq_table;
> -	struct irq_router_handler *h;
> +	struct pci_dev *dev;
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_BIOS
>   	if (!rt->signature) {
> @@ -930,27 +952,29 @@ static void __init pirq_find_router(stru
>   	DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Attempting to find IRQ router for [%04x:%04x]\n",
>   	    rt->rtr_vendor, rt->rtr_device);
>
> -	pirq_router_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, rt->rtr_bus,
> -						      rt->rtr_devfn);
> -	if (!pirq_router_dev) {
> -		DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Interrupt router not found at "
> -			"%02x:%02x\n", rt->rtr_bus, rt->rtr_devfn);
> -		return;
> +	/* Use any vendor:device provided by the routing table or try all.  */
> +	if (rt->rtr_vendor) {
> +		dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, rt->rtr_bus,
> +						  rt->rtr_devfn);
> +		if (dev&&  pirq_try_router(r, rt, dev))
> +			pirq_router_dev = dev;
> +	} else {
> +		dev = NULL;
> +		for_each_pci_dev(dev) {
> +			if (pirq_try_router(r, rt, dev)) {
> +				pirq_router_dev = dev;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
>   	}
>
> -	for (h = pirq_routers; h->vendor; h++) {
> -		/* First look for a router match */
> -		if (rt->rtr_vendor == h->vendor&&
> -			h->probe(r, pirq_router_dev, rt->rtr_device))
> -			break;
> -		/* Fall back to a device match */
> -		if (pirq_router_dev->vendor == h->vendor&&
> -			h->probe(r, pirq_router_dev, pirq_router_dev->device))
> -			break;
> -	}
> -	dev_info(&pirq_router_dev->dev, "%s IRQ router [%04x:%04x]\n",
> -		 pirq_router.name,
> -		 pirq_router_dev->vendor, pirq_router_dev->device);
> +	if (pirq_router_dev)
> +		dev_info(&pirq_router_dev->dev, "%s IRQ router [%04x:%04x]\n",
> +			 pirq_router.name,
> +			 pirq_router_dev->vendor, pirq_router_dev->device);
> +	else
> +		DBG(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Interrupt router not found at "
> +		    "%02x:%02x\n", rt->rtr_bus, rt->rtr_devfn);
>
>   	/* The device remains referenced for the kernel lifetime */
>   }
>