lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOdA0vy58Lr6FPeE@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 20:15:46 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
Cc:     3chas3@...il.com, linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] drivers: atm: Follow the indentation coding
 standard on printks

> diff --git a/drivers/atm/iphase.c b/drivers/atm/iphase.c
> index bc8e8d9f176b..8a3ee51e6c9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/atm/iphase.c
> +++ b/drivers/atm/iphase.c
> @@ -1246,8 +1246,8 @@ static void rx_intr(struct atm_dev *dev)
>                 ((iadev->rx_pkt_cnt - iadev->rx_tmp_cnt) == 0)) {
>          for (i = 1; i <= iadev->num_rx_desc; i++)
>                 free_desc(dev, i);
> -printk("Test logic RUN!!!!\n");
> -        writew( ~(RX_FREEQ_EMPT|RX_EXCP_RCVD),iadev->reass_reg+REASS_MASK_REG);
> +        printk("Test logic RUN!!!!\n");
> + 	writew( ~(RX_FREEQ_EMPT|RX_EXCP_RCVD),iadev->reass_reg+REASS_MASK_REG);
>          iadev->rxing = 1;
>       }

It looks like you turned a set of spaces into a tab for the writew()
line. Please don't make such whitespace changes in the same patch as
other changes.

Yes, lots of things to learn before you get your first patch accepted...

>> +++ b/drivers/atm/zatm.c
> @@ -664,7 +644,7 @@ static int do_tx(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  		EVENT("dsc (0x%lx)\n",(unsigned long) dsc,0);
>  	}
>  	else {
> -printk("NONONONOO!!!!\n");
> +		printk("NONONONOO!!!!\n");
>  		dsc = NULL;

This seems like an error message. So maybe

     pr_err("NONONONOO!!!!\n");

These ATM drivers don't appear to be netdev drivers. There does not
appear to be a struct device available, so you have to fall back to
pr_err(), pr_info() etc.

	  Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ