linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v0.1 0/9] UMCG early preview/RFC patchset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPNVh5d12sEqwKj-=aXWOQjxBXLcmwgQ9KiRNSTtGhL9PVT9vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:44:00 -0700
From:   Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
To:     Thierry Delisle <tdelisle@...terloo.ca>
Cc:     linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pjt@...gle.com, posk@...k.io, Peter Buhr <pabuhr@...terloo.ca>,
        Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0.1 0/9] UMCG early preview/RFC patchset

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 10:45 AM Thierry Delisle <tdelisle@...terloo.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I wanted to way-in on this. I am one of the main developer's on the Cforall
> programming language (https://cforall.uwaterloo.ca), which implements
> its own
> M:N user-threading runtime. I want to state that this RFC is an interesting
> feature, which we would be able to take advantage of immediately, assuming
> performance and flexibility closely match state-of-the-art implementations.

Hi Thierry,

Thank you for your message! I just posted a new version/approach:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210708194638.128950-1-posk@google.com/

Let's move the discussion to the new thread.

Thanks,
Peter

[...]