[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOZ9JZlwkjyDGti5@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 05:20:53 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@...eaurora.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...nel.org>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...gle.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>,
??rjan Eide <orjan.eide@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>,
James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: page pools, was Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] drm: Add a sharable drm
page-pool implementation
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 12:35:23PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> So, as Christian mentioned, on the TTM side it's useful, as they are
> trying to avoid TLB flushes when changing caching attributes.
>
> For the dmabuf system heap purposes, the main benefit is moving the
> page zeroing to the free path, rather than the allocation path. This
> on its own doesn't save much, but allows us to defer frees (and thus
> the zeroing) to the background, which can get that work out of the hot
> path.
I really do no think that is worth it to fragment the free pages.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists