lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n52XPJ7COZc7Zy=721-FGPX9D=vSFR_qccL86UXuABuy9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:04:51 +0000
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Odelu Kukatla <okukatla@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, evgreen@...gle.com,
        georgi.djakov@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     seansw@....qualcomm.com, elder@...aro.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add EPSS L3 interconnect provider

Quoting Odelu Kukatla (2021-06-18 04:28:54)
> Add Epoch Subsystem (EPSS) L3 interconnect provider node on SC7280
> SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Odelu Kukatla <okukatla@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 38a7f55..7690d7e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -1153,6 +1153,15 @@
>                         };
>                 };
>
> +               epss_l3: interconnect@...90000 {
> +                       compatible = "qcom,sc7280-epss-l3";
> +                       reg = <0 0x18590000 0 1000>, <0 0x18591000 0 0x100>,
> +                               <0 0x18592000 0 0x100>, <0 0x18593000 0 0x100>;
> +                       clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_GPLL0>;
> +                       clock-names = "xo", "alternate";
> +                       #interconnect-cells = <1>;
> +               };

Is this inside the soc node? Because it should be but then the next node
is called 'interconnect' and has no address so that is probably outside
the soc node. Please put nodes with a reg property like this into the
soc node.

> +
>                 clk_virt: interconnect {
>                         compatible = "qcom,sc7280-clk-virt";
>                         #interconnect-cells = <2>;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ