[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51434508-e2ad-c9f9-2612-2a9162cec71d@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:59:15 -0400
From: Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
scott.branden@...adcom.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
nayna@...ux.ibm.com, ebiggers@...gle.com, ardb@...nel.org,
nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, lszubowi@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, pjones@...hat.com,
glin@...e.com, "konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/12] Enroll kernel keys thru MOK
On 7/8/21 9:10 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Definitely not ".trusted_platform" keyring, as it would be too
> confusing with the existing "trusted" key type [1]. At least for now,
> leave it as ".mok".
Since this keyring is meant only for "CA" keys, can we name it as ".ca" ?
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
Powered by blists - more mailing lists