linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1 7/8] mshv: implement in-kernel device framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Jul 2021 19:14:05 +0000
From:   Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Linux on Hyper-V List <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
        Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Lillian Grassin-Drake <ligrassi@...rosoft.com>,
        Muminul Islam <muislam@...rosoft.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 7/8] mshv: implement in-kernel device framework

specifically On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 05:38:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:27:32PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Then don't define your own structure.  Use theirs.
> > 
> > I specifically mentioned in the cover letter I didn't do it because I
> > was not sure if that would be acceptable. I guess I will find out.
> 
> I only got patch 7/8.  You can't blame me for not reading 0/8 if you
> didn't send me 0/8.

To be clear I did not blame you.

You were not CC'ed on this patch, so presumably you got it via one of
the mailing lists. I'm not sure why you only got this one patch. Perhaps
if you wait a bit you will get the rest.

But it is all good. I appreciate the fact that you took the time to go
over this patch and voiced your opinion.

Wei.