[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878s2fnv79.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 21:28:10 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local exclusion scope
On Fri, Jul 09 2021 at 07:21, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2497,7 +2497,9 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_
> * partial array is full. Move the existing
> * set to the per node partial list.
> */
> + local_lock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
> unfreeze_partials(s);
> + local_unlock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
> oldpage = NULL;
> pobjects = 0;
> pages = 0;
> @@ -2579,7 +2581,9 @@ static void flush_cpu_slab(struct work_s
> if (c->page)
> flush_slab(s, c, true);
>
> + local_lock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
> unfreeze_partials(s);
> + local_unlock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
> }
>
> static bool has_cpu_slab(int cpu, struct kmem_cache *s)
> @@ -2632,8 +2636,11 @@ static int slub_cpu_dead(unsigned int cp
> struct kmem_cache *s;
>
> mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
> - list_for_each_entry(s, &slab_caches, list)
> + list_for_each_entry(s, &slab_caches, list) {
> + local_lock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
This one is odd. It locks the cpu_slab lock of the CPU which runs this
callback and then flushes the slab of the dead CPU.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists