linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/57] 4.4.274-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYv6u7fWHqz6-5Wk9iAk0D5eSSDQEAO+FW_0RS30Yuix=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:29:30 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/57] 4.4.274-rc1 review

On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 20:16, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.274 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed 30 Jun 2021 02:42:54 PM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-4.4.y&id2=v4.4.273
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> Thanks,
> Sasha


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions on arm64 noticed compared with v4.4.273.
GOOD: v4.4.273
BAD: v4.4.274

Regressions found on  arm64 juno-r2 and qemu_arm64 device.
ltp-containers-tests failed:
- netns_comm_ip_ipv6_ioctl
- netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_ioctl
- netns_comm_ip_ipv6_netlink
- netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv6_netlink
- netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv4_ioctl
- netns_netlink
- netns_comm_ip_ipv4_netlink
- netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv4_netlink
- netns_breakns_ip_ipv6_netlink
- netns_breakns_ip_ipv4_ioctl
- netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv4_netlink
- netns_comm_ip_ipv4_ioctl
- netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv4_ioctl
- netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_netlink
- netns_breakns_ip_ipv6_ioctl
- netns_breakns_ip_ipv4_netlink
- netns_breakns_ns_exec_ipv6_ioctl


Test output log:
-----------------
module tun: overflow in relocation type 261 val fffffdfffc000654
open: No such device
netns_netlink.c:103: TBROK: adding interface failed

netns_breakns 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 15m 0s
module veth: overflow in relocation type 261 val fffffdfffc040000
module veth: overflow in relocation type 261 val fffffdfffc080000
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
netns_breakns 1 TBROK: unable to create veth pair devices
Cannot find device \"veth0\"

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>


We have started the git bisection script to find the first bad commit causing
these LTP netns test failures.

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org