[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210710234857.3220040-4-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 19:48:08 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 04/53] pwm: spear: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
[ Upstream commit b601a18f12383001e7a8da238de7ca1559ebc450 ]
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
index 1a1cedfd11ce..6879b49581b3 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
@@ -228,10 +228,6 @@ static int spear_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++)
- pwm_disable(&pc->chip.pwms[i]);
/* clk was prepared in probe, hence unprepare it here */
clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists