linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwmon: da9063: HWMON driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9113bf9-ab00-d0b1-cbc2-f4107b93e727@infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 10 Jul 2021 21:58:33 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwmon: da9063: HWMON driver

On 7/10/21 9:44 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 02:55:02 +0000, Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:08:13 -0700, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>> Unnecessary include.
>> [...]
>>> I don't immediately see where this include is needed. Is this a
>>> leftover ?
>> [...]
>>> Same here.
>>
>> Are there ways to systematically tell which includes are useless
>> besides commenting them out all and uncommenting until it compiles ?
>> (if that is even a good idea)
> 
> I tried this, just to get a baseline: the module compiles with just
>    linux/hwmon.h
>    linux/mfd/da9063/core.h
>    linux/module.h
>    linux/platform_device.h
>    linux/regmap.h
> 
> Beyond what you suggested this also gets rid of:
> - seems reasonable:
>    - linux/delay.h
>    - linux/init.h
>    - linux/slab.h
> - looks suspicious to me:
>    - linux/err.h, which means the error constants are indirectly
>      imported. Removing it feels brittle.
>    - linux/kernel.h, although to my surprise a lot of c files do not
>      include it.
> 
> By default I'll drop the former and keep the latter in the
> next version, please let me know if another combination is preferred.
> 

Hi,

Please use Rule #1 from Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst:

1) If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
    that facility.  Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones
    that you use.


so if Enumbers (error numbers) are used, then #include the header file
for that.

etc.

thanks.

-- 
~Randy