linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 177/700] hwmon: (max31790) Report correct current pwm duty cycles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210712060951.459176971@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:04:20 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@...net.cz>,
        Václav Kubernát <kubernat@...net.cz>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Václav Kubernát <kubernat@...snet.cz>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 177/700] hwmon: (max31790) Report correct current pwm duty cycles

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

[ Upstream commit 897f6339893b741a5d68ae8e2475df65946041c2 ]

The MAX31790 has two sets of registers for pwm duty cycles, one to request
a duty cycle and one to read the actual current duty cycle. Both do not
have to be the same.

When reporting the pwm duty cycle to the user, the actual pwm duty cycle
from pwm duty cycle registers needs to be reported. When setting it, the
pwm target duty cycle needs to be written. Since we don't know the actual
pwm duty cycle after a target pwm duty cycle has been written, set the
valid flag to false to indicate that actual pwm duty cycle should be read
from the chip instead of using cached values.

Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@...net.cz>
Cc: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@...net.cz>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Tested-by: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@...snet.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@...net.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526154022.3223012-3-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/hwmon/max31790.rst | 3 ++-
 drivers/hwmon/max31790.c         | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/max31790.rst b/Documentation/hwmon/max31790.rst
index f301385d8cef..54ff0f49e28f 100644
--- a/Documentation/hwmon/max31790.rst
+++ b/Documentation/hwmon/max31790.rst
@@ -39,5 +39,6 @@ fan[1-12]_input    RO  fan tachometer speed in RPM
 fan[1-12]_fault    RO  fan experienced fault
 fan[1-6]_target    RW  desired fan speed in RPM
 pwm[1-6]_enable    RW  regulator mode, 0=disabled, 1=manual mode, 2=rpm mode
-pwm[1-6]           RW  fan target duty cycle (0-255)
+pwm[1-6]           RW  read: current pwm duty cycle,
+                       write: target pwm duty cycle (0-255)
 ================== === =======================================================
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/max31790.c b/drivers/hwmon/max31790.c
index 86e6c71db685..8ad7a45bfe68 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/max31790.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/max31790.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static struct max31790_data *max31790_update_device(struct device *dev)
 				data->tach[NR_CHANNEL + i] = rv;
 			} else {
 				rv = i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(client,
-						MAX31790_REG_PWMOUT(i));
+						MAX31790_REG_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE(i));
 				if (rv < 0)
 					goto abort;
 				data->pwm[i] = rv;
@@ -299,10 +299,10 @@ static int max31790_write_pwm(struct device *dev, u32 attr, int channel,
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			break;
 		}
-		data->pwm[channel] = val << 8;
+		data->valid = false;
 		err = i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped(client,
 						   MAX31790_REG_PWMOUT(channel),
-						   data->pwm[channel]);
+						   val << 8);
 		break;
 	case hwmon_pwm_enable:
 		fan_config = data->fan_config[channel];
-- 
2.30.2