linux-kernel - [PATCH v13 075/137] mm/writeback: Add folio_redirty_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:05:59 +0100
From:   "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH v13 075/137] mm/writeback: Add folio_redirty_for_writepage()

Reimplement redirty_page_for_writepage() as a wrapper around
folio_redirty_for_writepage().  Account the number of pages in the
folio, add kernel-doc and move the prototype to writeback.h.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c     |  1 +
 include/linux/mm.h        |  4 ----
 include/linux/writeback.h |  2 ++
 mm/folio-compat.c         |  7 +++++++
 mm/page-writeback.c       | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c
index 176580f54af9..104ae698443e 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
 #include <linux/mempool.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/writeback.h>
 #include "jfs_incore.h"
 #include "jfs_superblock.h"
 #include "jfs_filsys.h"
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 93c2b9b6ab7b..862b5be4583e 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -36,9 +36,7 @@
 struct mempolicy;
 struct anon_vma;
 struct anon_vma_chain;
-struct file_ra_state;
 struct user_struct;
-struct writeback_control;
 struct pt_regs;
 
 extern int sysctl_page_lock_unfairness;
@@ -1999,8 +1997,6 @@ extern int try_to_release_page(struct page * page, gfp_t gfp_mask);
 extern void do_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
 			      unsigned int length);
 
-int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
-				struct page *page);
 bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio);
 bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
 int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page);
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 50cb6e25ab9e..5383f7e39816 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -404,6 +404,8 @@ static inline void account_page_redirty(struct page *page)
 {
 	folio_account_redirty(page_folio(page));
 }
+bool folio_redirty_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *, struct folio *);
+bool redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *, struct page *);
 
 void sb_mark_inode_writeback(struct inode *inode);
 void sb_clear_inode_writeback(struct inode *inode);
diff --git a/mm/folio-compat.c b/mm/folio-compat.c
index 39f5a8d963b1..c1e01bc36d32 100644
--- a/mm/folio-compat.c
+++ b/mm/folio-compat.c
@@ -95,3 +95,10 @@ bool clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page)
 	return folio_clear_dirty_for_io(page_folio(page));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page_dirty_for_io);
+
+bool redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
+		struct page *page)
+{
+	return folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, page_folio(page));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 593b4f4f5f22..1a5677d099ea 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2558,21 +2558,31 @@ void folio_account_redirty(struct folio *folio)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_account_redirty);
 
-/*
- * When a writepage implementation decides that it doesn't want to write this
- * page for some reason, it should redirty the locked page via
- * redirty_page_for_writepage() and it should then unlock the page and return 0
+/**
+ * folio_redirty_for_writepage - Decline to write a dirty folio.
+ * @wbc: The writeback control.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ *
+ * When a writepage implementation decides that it doesn't want to write
+ * @folio for some reason, it should call this function, unlock @folio and
+ * return 0.
+ *
+ * Return: True if we redirtied the folio.  False if someone else dirtied
+ * it first.
  */
-int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct page *page)
+bool folio_redirty_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
+		struct folio *folio)
 {
-	int ret;
+	bool ret;
+	unsigned nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+	wbc->pages_skipped += nr;
+	ret = filemap_dirty_folio(folio->mapping, folio);
+	folio_account_redirty(folio);
 
-	wbc->pages_skipped++;
-	ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
-	account_page_redirty(page);
 	return ret;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_redirty_for_writepage);
 
 /**
  * folio_mark_dirty - Mark a folio as being modified.
-- 
2.30.2