linux-kernel - [PATCH v13 078/137] mm/filemap: Add readahead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210712030701.4000097-79-willy@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:06:02 +0100
From:   "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH v13 078/137] mm/filemap: Add readahead_folio()

The pointers stored in the page cache are folios, by definition.
This change comes with a behaviour change -- callers of readahead_folio()
are no longer required to put the page reference themselves.  This matches
how readpage works, rather than matching how readpages used to work.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 include/linux/pagemap.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 1aee9f711de8..c0506722d209 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -988,33 +988,56 @@ void page_cache_async_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
 	page_cache_async_ra(&ractl, page, req_count);
 }
 
+static inline struct folio *__readahead_folio(struct readahead_control *ractl)
+{
+	struct folio *folio;
+
+	BUG_ON(ractl->_batch_count > ractl->_nr_pages);
+	ractl->_nr_pages -= ractl->_batch_count;
+	ractl->_index += ractl->_batch_count;
+
+	if (!ractl->_nr_pages) {
+		ractl->_batch_count = 0;
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	folio = xa_load(&ractl->mapping->i_pages, ractl->_index);
+	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_locked(folio), folio);
+	ractl->_batch_count = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+	return folio;
+}
+
 /**
  * readahead_page - Get the next page to read.
- * @rac: The current readahead request.
+ * @ractl: The current readahead request.
  *
  * Context: The page is locked and has an elevated refcount.  The caller
  * should decreases the refcount once the page has been submitted for I/O
  * and unlock the page once all I/O to that page has completed.
  * Return: A pointer to the next page, or %NULL if we are done.
  */
-static inline struct page *readahead_page(struct readahead_control *rac)
+static inline struct page *readahead_page(struct readahead_control *ractl)
 {
-	struct page *page;
+	struct folio *folio = __readahead_folio(ractl);
 
-	BUG_ON(rac->_batch_count > rac->_nr_pages);
-	rac->_nr_pages -= rac->_batch_count;
-	rac->_index += rac->_batch_count;
-
-	if (!rac->_nr_pages) {
-		rac->_batch_count = 0;
-		return NULL;
-	}
+	return &folio->page;
+}
 
-	page = xa_load(&rac->mapping->i_pages, rac->_index);
-	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
-	rac->_batch_count = thp_nr_pages(page);
+/**
+ * readahead_folio - Get the next folio to read.
+ * @ractl: The current readahead request.
+ *
+ * Context: The folio is locked.  The caller should unlock the folio once
+ * all I/O to that folio has completed.
+ * Return: A pointer to the next folio, or %NULL if we are done.
+ */
+static inline struct folio *readahead_folio(struct readahead_control *ractl)
+{
+	struct folio *folio = __readahead_folio(ractl);
 
-	return page;
+	folio_put(folio);
+	return folio;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int __readahead_batch(struct readahead_control *rac,
-- 
2.30.2