linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.13 264/800] writeback, cgroup: increment isw_nr_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210712060951.822691015@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:04:47 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 264/800] writeback, cgroup: increment isw_nr_in_flight before grabbing an inode

From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>

[ Upstream commit 8826ee4fe75051f8cbfa5d4a9aa70565938e724c ]

isw_nr_in_flight is used to determine whether the inode switch queue
should be flushed from the umount path.  Currently it's increased after
grabbing an inode and even scheduling the switch work.  It means the
umount path can walk past cleanup_offline_cgwb() with active inode
references, which can result in a "Busy inodes after unmount." message and
use-after-free issues (with inode->i_sb which gets freed).

Fix it by incrementing isw_nr_in_flight before doing anything with the
inode and decrementing in the case when switching wasn't scheduled.

The problem hasn't yet been seen in the real life and was discovered by
Jan Kara by looking into the code.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210608230225.2078447-4-guro@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 7c46d1588a19..d684f541af48 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -505,6 +505,8 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 	if (!isw)
 		return;
 
+	atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight);
+
 	/* find and pin the new wb */
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	memcg_css = css_from_id(new_wb_id, &memory_cgrp_subsys);
@@ -535,11 +537,10 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 	 * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible.
 	 */
 	call_rcu(&isw->rcu_head, inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn);
-
-	atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 	return;
 
 out_free:
+	atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 	if (isw->new_wb)
 		wb_put(isw->new_wb);
 	kfree(isw);
-- 
2.30.2