[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XcdUtzZCPcmr+=b5kJ=563KroEtfMATquwkqd6Z11JCDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:03:30 +0000
From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To: Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@...ro.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam@...dozajonas.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] net/ncsi: add dummy response handler for Intel boards
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 12:28, Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@...ro.com> wrote:
>
> Add the dummy response handler for Intel boards to prevent incorrect
> handling of OEM commands.
What do you mean?
Is this to handle the response to the link up OEM command? If so,
include it in the same patch.
Can you check that the response is to the link up command and print a
warning if not?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@...ro.com>
> ---
> net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c b/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c
> index 04bc50be5c01..d48374894817 100644
> --- a/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c
> +++ b/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c
> @@ -699,12 +699,19 @@ static int ncsi_rsp_handler_oem_bcm(struct ncsi_request *nr)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Response handler for Intel card */
> +static int ncsi_rsp_handler_oem_intel(struct ncsi_request *nr)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct ncsi_rsp_oem_handler {
> unsigned int mfr_id;
> int (*handler)(struct ncsi_request *nr);
> } ncsi_rsp_oem_handlers[] = {
> { NCSI_OEM_MFR_MLX_ID, ncsi_rsp_handler_oem_mlx },
> - { NCSI_OEM_MFR_BCM_ID, ncsi_rsp_handler_oem_bcm }
> + { NCSI_OEM_MFR_BCM_ID, ncsi_rsp_handler_oem_bcm },
> + { NCSI_OEM_MFR_INTEL_ID, ncsi_rsp_handler_oem_intel }
> };
>
> /* Response handler for OEM command */
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists