linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: bd718x7: Suopport configuring UVP/OVP state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162608654079.4419.9645634631307763759.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 11:45:47 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-power@...rohmeurope.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: bd718x7: Suopport configuring UVP/OVP state

On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:54:33 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The ROHM BD71837/47/50/78 do support enabling/disabling the under/over
> voltage protection. Add support for enabling/disabling the protection
> according to the device-tree information.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: bd718x7: Suopport configuring UVP/OVP state
      commit: fedbfea13cc0e513956abfa5c22158f0523d5687

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark