[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOwx1lZxLPIRQIJn@osiris>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:13:10 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/cio: Make struct css_driver::remove return
void
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 04:34:31PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Vineeth,
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Vineeth Vijayan wrote:
> > Thank you. I will use the modified description. This will be picked up by
> > Vasily/Heiko to the s390-tree.
> >
> > Also Acked-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>
> >
> > One question, is this patchset supposed to have 4 patches ? Are we missing
> > one ?
>
> Yes, the fourth patch[1] has the following shortstat:
>
> 80 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 219 deletions(-)
>
> and the affected files are distributed over the whole source tree.
>
> Given that this fourth patch is the actual motivation for the first
> three, and I'd like to get this in during the next merge window, I would
> prefer if these patches were taken together. (Well unless the first
> three make it into 5.14-rc1 of course.)
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210706154803.1631813-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
In this case I think Greg should pick up all four patches.
FWIW: it's usually also not very helpful to cc people only on parts of
a patch series and let them figure out the bigger picture.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists