linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/593] 5.10.50-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtdYvUse1Osfrux6DVU_DiLAKveQqnEZ36eoG-fThJBqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:51:53 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/593] 5.10.50-rc1 review

On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 11:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.50 release.
> There are 593 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regression detected on powerpc,

Regressions found on powerpc:
 - build/gcc-10-cell_defconfig
 - build/gcc-10-maple_defconfig
 - build/gcc-10-defconfig
 - build/gcc-8-defconfig
 - build/gcc-9-defconfig
 - build/gcc-9-maple_defconfig
 - build/gcc-8-maple_defconfig
 - build/gcc-8-cell_defconfig
 - build/gcc-9-cell_defconfig

The following patch caused build warnings / errors on powerpc.

> Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>     powerpc/stacktrace: Fix spurious "stale" traces in raise_backtrace_ipi()

Build error:
--------------
arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'raise_backtrace_ipi':
arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c:248:5: error: implicit declaration of
function 'udelay' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  248 |     udelay(1);
      |     ^~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

link to build log:
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/1vCh34NozLpcdYwjDS72K2fkiM3/

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org