[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOxFdUCVTT9mFXtk@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:36:53 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:18:11AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:26 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> > > hence drop unnecessary duplication.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> >
> > I think this should go into Russell's patch tracker for convenience,
> > if you're not familiar with it I can sign it off and put it in there,
> > just tell me.
>
> Nope, I'm not. Please do, thanks!
>
> Since he kept silent I suppose it means an agreement on the change.
> It's quite straightforward and can be tested easily.
Any new on this, please?
It's kinda not good when the (simplest) patch is stuck like this :-(
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists