linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210712135645.GA28881@willie-the-truck>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:56:45 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@....com, paulus@...ba.org,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        bskeggs@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@...el.com,
        linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        jgross@...e.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, xypron.glpk@....de,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for
 swiotlb data bouncing

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 05:57:21PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:46:07AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 04:05:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > > FWIW I was pondering the question of whether to do something along those 
> > > > > lines or just scrap the default assignment entirely, so since I hadn't got 
> > > > > round to saying that I've gone ahead and hacked up the alternative 
> > > > > (similarly untested) for comparison :)
> > > > >
> > > > > TBH I'm still not sure which one I prefer...
> > > > 
> > > > Claire did implement something like your suggestion originally, but
> > > > I don't really like it as it doesn't scale for adding multiple global
> > > > pools, e.g. for the 64-bit addressable one for the various encrypted
> > > > secure guest schemes.
> > > 
> > > Couple of things:
> > >  - I am not pushing to Linus the Claire's patchset until we have a
> > >    resolution on this. I hope you all agree that is a sensible way
> > >    forward as much as I hate doing that.
> > 
> > Sure, it's a pity but we could clearly use a bit more time to get these
> > just right and we've run out of time for 5.14.
> > 
> > I think the main question I have is how would you like to see patches for
> > 5.15? i.e. as patches on top of devel/for-linus-5.14 or something else?
> 
> Yes that would be perfect. If there are any dependencies on the rc1, I
> can rebase it on top of that.

Yes, please, rebasing would be very helpful. The broader rework of
'io_tlb_default_mem' is going to conflict quite badly otherwise.

Cheers,

Will