linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] software nodes: Split software_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:03:43 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] software nodes: Split software_node_notify()

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:27:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Split software_node_notify_remove) out of software_node_notify()
> and make device_platform_notify() call the latter on device addition
> and the former on device removal.
> 
> While at it, put the headers of the above functions into base.h,
> because they don't need to be present in a global header file.
> 
> No intentional functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/base.h      |    3 ++
>  drivers/base/core.c      |    9 +++---
>  drivers/base/swnode.c    |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  include/linux/property.h |    2 -
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/swnode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/swnode.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/swnode.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>  #include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
> +#include "base.h"
> +
>  struct swnode {
>  	struct kobject kobj;
>  	struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
> @@ -1053,7 +1055,7 @@ int device_add_software_node(struct devi
>  	 * balance.
>  	 */
>  	if (device_is_registered(dev))
> -		software_node_notify(dev, KOBJ_ADD);
> +		software_node_notify(dev);

Should this now be called "software_node_notify_add()" to match up with:

>  	if (device_is_registered(dev))
> -		software_node_notify(dev, KOBJ_REMOVE);
> +		software_node_notify_remove(dev);

The other being called "_remove"?

Makes it more obvious to me :)

thanks,

greg k-h