linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] ACPI: glue: Eliminate acpi_platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:35:59 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] ACPI: glue: Eliminate acpi_platform_notify()

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:25:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Get rid of acpi_platform_notify() which is redundant and
> make device_platform_notify() in the driver core call
> acpi_device_notify() and acpi_device_notify_remove() directly.

> +	if (action == KOBJ_ADD)
> +		acpi_device_notify(dev);
> +	else if (action == KOBJ_REMOVE)
> +		acpi_device_notify_remove(dev);

In most of the cases we are using switch-case approach with
KOBJ_ADD/KOBJ_REMOVE. Would it make sense to keep that pattern?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko