[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOyLj4/s9Sclo/Wl@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:35:59 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] ACPI: glue: Eliminate acpi_platform_notify()
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:25:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Get rid of acpi_platform_notify() which is redundant and
> make device_platform_notify() in the driver core call
> acpi_device_notify() and acpi_device_notify_remove() directly.
> + if (action == KOBJ_ADD)
> + acpi_device_notify(dev);
> + else if (action == KOBJ_REMOVE)
> + acpi_device_notify_remove(dev);
In most of the cases we are using switch-case approach with
KOBJ_ADD/KOBJ_REMOVE. Would it make sense to keep that pattern?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists